Saturday 21 October 2017 ,
Saturday 21 October 2017 ,
Latest News
  • Rains cripple life across country
  • Fallen tree halts traffic between Dhaka and northern region
  • President off to London for medical checkup
  • Steady hand: how to do open-heart surgery in a quake
  • IS claims responsibility for Afghan mosque attack
19 June, 2017 00:00 00 AM
Print

Kansas, where Trump’s favored tax doctrine already failed

AFP
Kansas, where Trump’s favored tax doctrine already failed
Even Republicans in Kansas are distancing themselves from the governor's failed plan to boost growth by drastically cutting taxes, a move that left the state with substandard schools and struggling to provide basis services. AFP PHOTO

AFP, WASHINGTON: Cut taxes to boost growth: Long before Donald Trump became president, Kansas conducted a real-world experiment with this formula in the hopes of reviving its economy.
But today the Midwestern state is beating a hasty retreat after the demonstrable failure of the ideas that have been embraced by the White House.
In 2012, staunchly conservative Governor Sam Brownback rolled out what he promised would be “a shot of adrenaline into the heart of the Kansas economy,” which depends heavily on agriculture and aerospace.
Similar in many ways to the Trump administration’s fiscal plans, the shock therapy cut local income taxes for the very wealthy and eliminated certain taxes on small business revenue, particularly for the self-employed.
Brownback promised the strategy would create thousands of jobs, encourage Americans to move to the state and help make it “the best place in America to start and grow a small business.”
Five years later, the party is over. Growth has plummeted to below one percent,
 from three percent in 2012, falling well below the national average, according to the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank.
As a result, tax revenues dried up, blowing a $900-million hole in the state’s budget in two years, creating a crisis in which the government is struggling to provide basic services.
“The revenue loss was much larger than anticipated because people took advantage of the cuts by turning themselves into small businesses or independents to avoid paying any taxes,” said Alan Cole of the Tax Foundation in Washington.
In March, the state Supreme Court ruled the education system in Kansas failed to meet minimum standards guaranteed under the state constitution.
Rejecting the governor 
“This plan was an absolute disaster. It caused economic destruction,” said Jim Ward, leader of the opposition Democrats in the Kansas House of Representatives.
“There was just nowhere you could point to where it was successful in terms of providing core services.”
But even Republicans now repudiate the Brownback tax plan.
After losing 12 seats in the 2016 elections, the large Republican majority has approved a $1.2 billion tax hike over two years—overriding a veto this week to do so, in a show of determined opposition to the governor.
Brownback deplored the vote, saying “it’s wrong for the long-term view of the state of Kansas, it’s wrong for growth.”
But even supporters of low taxes are finding it hard to defend him.
“It was a good idea that was poorly implemented,” said Dave Trabert of the Kansas Policy Institute, a think tank that promotes free market economics and “personal freedom for all Kansans.”
“There was success but the governor made the classic mistake of over-promising and displayed political exuberance,” he added.
Such warnings could reverberate well beyond the state’s borders, all the way to Washington, where Trump has vowed to double economic growth to three percent while slashing corporate taxes by 20 percentage points, and providing tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans.
Economists say there is little evidence such tax cuts can pay for themselves by spurring growth, as the Trump administration claims, and even Republican lawmakers in Washington who are fearful of deficits doubt the wisdom of the plan.
“It’s an illusion to think that you can get more revenue by cutting taxes, it’s a fantasy,” said Charles Wheelan, senior lecturer at Dartmouth College.
“You cannot eat more ice cream and expect to lose weight.”

Comments

Poll
Today's Question »
Do you agree with Obaidul Quader’s remark that the court is not harassing Khaleda Zia, rather she has been harassing the court by repeatedly seeking time?
 Yes
 No
 No Comment
Yes 17.0%
No 81.1%
No Comment 1.9%
Most Viewed
Digital Edition
Archive
SunMonTueWedThuFri Sat
01020304050607
08091011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031

Copyright © All right reserved.

Editor : M. Shamsur Rahman

Published by the Editor on behalf of Independent Publications Limited at Media Printers, 446/H, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1215.
Editorial, News & Commercial Offices : Beximco Media Complex, 149-150 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh. GPO Box No. 934, Dhaka-1000.

Editor : M. Shamsur Rahman
Published by the Editor on behalf of Independent Publications Limited at Media Printers, 446/H, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1215.
Editorial, News & Commercial Offices : Beximco Media Complex, 149-150 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh. GPO Box No. 934, Dhaka-1000.

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
....................................................
About Us
....................................................
Contact Us
....................................................
Advertisement
....................................................
Subscription

Powered by : Frog Hosting