Tuesday 18 February 2020 ,
Tuesday 18 February 2020 ,
Latest News
  • Coronavirus Outbreak: Death toll hits 1,868
  • Popular actor Tapas Pal dies
  • Messi, Hamilton share Laureus World Sportsman of the Year award
  • Political clouts spike losses of gas companies
  • AL’s Rezaul vows to build healthy city
  • Metro rail replica to be displayed from March
  • One judge for 1 lakh people in country: Minister
  • China urges Bangladesh not to go for other countries
  • Mobile radiation is not harmful to health: BTRC
1 November, 2019 00:00 00 AM / LAST MODIFIED: 1 November, 2019 12:25:44 AM
Print

UK general election: Why it’s impossible to just ‘get Brexit done’

Chris Grey

We are now approaching the third occasion when a deadline for Brexit has been missed. The first two – on March 29 and April 12 – were followed by the departure of Theresa May as British prime minister. Her successor, Boris Johnson, made leaving on October 31 the defining issue of his leadership. Tomorrow was to be the day that “do or die” Britain would leave “with or without a deal”.

But the possibility of leaving without a deal was scuppered by the British parliament. Instead, MPs demanded that  Johnson write to the European Union asking for an extension if he had not struck a deal that had also been approved by parliament. He did manage to reach a deal with the EU – but it hasn’t been passed by parliament. Thus, extremely grudgingly, he wrote a letter asking for an extension.

Even so, his deal did get majority support at second reading – that is to say, it was agreed in principle but subject to discussion and possible amendment. But parliament has not approved the extremely truncated timetable he proposed for that discussion and amendment.

To the puzzlement of many observers, rather than just change the timetable, Johnson decided to seek a general election. That, too, required parliamentary agreement, which, barring some formalities to be completed today, has been secured. An election will therefore take place on December 12 against the background of the nature of Brexit still hanging in the balance, and in an atmosphere of political crisis.

These events have posed serious problems for the EU, where there is a mixture of bemusement and exasperation. They do not want the Brexit crisis to drag on endlessly, but nor do they want there to be no deal. And if there is no deal, they don’t want to be seen as being responsible for it by having refused an extension. Equally, they didn’t want to set a date which – by its shortness or length – seemed to frame, and therefore interfere with, the choices open to the UK. A short extension would have precluded an election. In the end, EU leaders opted for the simplest course by agreeing the date that the UK had asked for of January 31, 2020.

An additional, and under-recognised, problem for both the UK and the EU is that the later the UK leaves, the shorter the transition period between legal departure and actual departure. This period is needed to negotiate the complex matters of Britain’s future trade and other relationships with the EU. In the absence of that transition period also being extended, it will expire at the end of 2020.

This situation makes it very difficult for British businesses and individuals to plan their affairs. The government had been running a massive public information campaign based on the October 31 date. It covered everything from obtaining new export licences to arrangements for taking pets on holiday.

Many have planned on that basis – unnecessarily, as it turns out. Others have not done so, either because the advice offered lacked detail and clarity or, especially for small businesses, because they could not afford to. Some may have correctly calculated that, like the previous deadlines, this one would come and go. Still others have so deeply imbibed the dismissal of "Project Fear" – the term adopted by  Johnson during campaigning for Brexit in the 2016 referendum – that they think come what may, nothing much will change if Britain leaves the EU, whatever the date or the terms.I have written to Jeremy Corbyn: this Parliament must get Brexit done now or a NEW Parliament must get Brexit done so the country can move on.

It is easy to conclude from these twists and turns that the British political system, and perhaps even its uncodified constitution, is broken. That is not really so. The constitution is actually working robustly to maintain the separation of powers between executive, legislature and judiciary. The political system is working as it should to accurately reflect the views of the British people.

The problem is that those views remain evenly split between leaving the EU and staying. And while in principle, the narrow majority of 52 per cent who voted to leave in the 2016 referendum answered this question, it was not specified which of the many possible ways of leaving should be followed. Thus, any concrete version of Brexit does not have the backing of all who support Brexit, nor does it have the backing of any who do not; hence the impasse.

It is by no means clear that this latest extension will do anything to resolve matters. The election will be very bitterly fought and the outcome is highly unpredictable, even though  Johnson’s Conservatives currently lead in the polls.

A key factor will be the impact of the prime minister’s failure to deliver his high-profile, unequivocal promise to have left by Thursday. That is likely to boost support for Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party. Meanwhile, Remain-leaning voters are likely to vote tactically for the party best-placed to defeat the Conservatives.

The writer is a professor of organisation studies at Royal Holloway, University of London and the author of The Brexit Blog

 

 

Comments

More Op-ed stories
The psychology of learning applied to teaching The topic captioned above is a thought- provoking and complex one for which I was looking for an opportunity of presenting it to my esteemed readers for a long time. Not only the past but also some recent…

Copyright © All right reserved.

Editor : M. Shamsur Rahman

Published by the Editor on behalf of Independent Publications Limited at Media Printers, 446/H, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1215.
Editorial, News & Commercial Offices : Beximco Media Complex, 149-150 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh. GPO Box No. 934, Dhaka-1000.

Editor : M. Shamsur Rahman
Published by the Editor on behalf of Independent Publications Limited at Media Printers, 446/H, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1215.
Editorial, News & Commercial Offices : Beximco Media Complex, 149-150 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh. GPO Box No. 934, Dhaka-1000.

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
....................................................
About Us
....................................................
Contact Us
....................................................
Advertisement
....................................................
Subscription

Powered by : Frog Hosting