Thursday 17 October 2019 ,
Thursday 17 October 2019 ,
Latest News
  • FIFA President meets PM Hasina
  • 35 killed in bus crash near Saudi's Mecca
  • BUET students take oath to thwart criminal activities
  • Early Rohingya return better for Bangladesh
  • ‘Country self-sufficient in meat, crops, vegetables production’
  • MRP booklet crisis worries expats
  • BSTI fines 4 fuel pumps for cheating in filling
  • UN for joint efforts to eradicate poverty
  • Nusrat murder: Order on OC Moazzem’s bail petition Nov 3
  • PM urges all to be responsible on road to avert accident
  • Japan typhoon death toll climbs to 74
14 December, 2018 00:00 00 AM

Trump shouldn’t be impeached

Sholto Byrnes
Trump shouldn’t be impeached

The improbable presidency of Donald Trump – during which few norms of etiquette, decorum and propriety have remained unchallenged – appears to have, once again, pushed the boundaries of what the current occupant of the White House can get away with. Last Friday, prosecutors in the southern district of New York said that  Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, made illegal hush-money payments “to influence the 2016 presidential election… in co-ordination with and at the direction of Individual 1” – a codename that surely refers to  Trump. Then special counsel Robert Mueller made public details of contacts between  Cohen and high-ranking Russians, which, if undertaken with  Trump’s knowledge, would strengthen the case that there was collusion with the Kremlin and could expose the president to prosecution under various laws.

 Cohen has struck a deal and is going down for sure. Now, some are salivating at the prospect of impeachment or of  Trump being otherwise brought low by the law. “Is this the beginning of the end for Trump?” was the headline on a New York Times column whose authors clearly hoped that it was. But I do not believe that  Trump will be prosecuted or impeached. And nor, for the good of America, do I think he should.

To begin with, the Department of Justice guidelines are that no sitting president should be indicted. But, even if that were not the case, another of  Trump’s lawyers, the former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, cites legal precedent to argue that the payments to the two women who claim to have had affairs with  Trump do not count as campaign finance violations. Another ally, the Republican senator Rand Paul, agrees. Further, he says that the US has “over-criminalised” campaign finance and that the “thousands and thousands of rules” make it too easy for a candidate to slip up inadvertently.

So, prosecution on that front is, firstly, not going to happen and, secondly, arguably not deserved. As for impeachment, with the Republican Party in almost total capitulation to  Trump, it is extremely unlikely that enough GOP senators would abandon their leader in order for it to pass the upper house with the necessary two-thirds majority.

There are plenty who feel strongly that  Trump should face all manner of legal action. But both the American people and the Republican Party arguably set the bar at a new low when the latter rallied around him and the former elected him. For they did so in the knowledge that this was a candidate who had boasted during his campaign of committing sexual assault. They knew that he was a braggart, had a flexible relationship with the truth, and was a stranger to the deep policy analysis of which politicians of any experience should be capable. In many other countries, such knowledge would instantly have doomed any attempt to reach high office. Still, the Republicans accepted  Trump as their candidate and sufficient people voted for him to win the electoral college – which is all that counts, when it comes to taking the White House.

His core supporters knew that he had little respect for the rules. Indeed, they voted for him precisely because he promised to blow up the system. So, if he were to be brought down by what they regard as side issues, the outrage that would follow could easily lead to deepening divisions in American society and even civil unrest. Riots and deaths could not be ruled out. On Sunday, Angus King, an independent senator allied to the Democrats, acknowledged the possibility of this reaction in an interview with NBC. “If impeachment is moved forward on the evidence that we have now, at least a third of the country would think it was just political revenge and a coup against the president,” he said. “That wouldn’t serve us at all well.”

It is worth pointing out that the president and his supporters are correct when they insist that no definitive evidence at all of collusion between  Trump and the Kremlin has so far come to light. And just as with Brexit, campaigners, lawmakers and crusading journalists who have been tenaciously pursuing claims of Russian interference are missing the point. Even if they – and  Mueller – were to be vindicated, Russia is not the reason Britain voted to leave the EU and neither is it the reason why  Trump was elected.

The writer is a senior fellow at the Institute of Strategic and International Studies, Malaysia



More Editorial stories
US politicians accept Rohingya genocide In what can be a development from the recent declaration by the Holocaust Memorial Museum over the calculated persecution of Rohingys in Rakhine, members of US House of Representatives will pass a resolution…

Copyright © All right reserved.

Editor : M. Shamsur Rahman

Published by the Editor on behalf of Independent Publications Limited at Media Printers, 446/H, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1215.
Editorial, News & Commercial Offices : Beximco Media Complex, 149-150 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh. GPO Box No. 934, Dhaka-1000.

Editor : M. Shamsur Rahman
Published by the Editor on behalf of Independent Publications Limited at Media Printers, 446/H, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1215.
Editorial, News & Commercial Offices : Beximco Media Complex, 149-150 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh. GPO Box No. 934, Dhaka-1000.

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us

Powered by : Frog Hosting